The Cutting Edge-March 2013
Barbara F.
Anderson, Ph.D., LCSW
As promised last month, I’ll devote part of this column
to the updated Standards of Care
developed by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH).
To reorient the reader, the Standards of Care is a manual of clinical guidance
for the best medical and psychological treatment for individuals dealing with
gender concerns. The current document is
the 7th since 1979, each subsequent version incorporating the best
practices of the time. As the current
manual is 120 pages in length, this article can only summarize its high points.
2)
It adds gender non-conformity as a valid
identity, such as third gender or genderqueer.
3)
It removes all criteria that were previously
required for a step-by-step process to transitioning. One may or may not engage in psychological
treatment for a specific number of visits or period of time, take hormones or
observe inflexible waiting periods.
4)
A 1-year real life test or experience is no
longer required.
5)
However, a mental health screening or assessment
is needed for referral for medical treatment for gender dysphoria.
6)
The term “gender dysphoria” rather than the
diagnostic term “Gender Identity Disorder” is considered to be less
stigmatizing. This is consistent with
changes in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V).
In a future column, I’ll summarize the changes with
regard to gender variant behavior made by the American Psychiatric Association
in the newest revision of the DSM-V.
A regular column, The
Ethicist, appears weekly in the NY Times Sunday Magazine. In the Feb. 3, 2013 edition, a reader writes
the following. I’ve been living the life
of a married man for 20 years. I have a successful career and 3 children. All this time, however, I have battled gender
dysphoria and the deep sadness that comes from living a lie. To summarize,
the writer states he has been unhappy as a man his whole life and plans to
transition. He asks if it is ethical to
follow this path even if it ends his marriage, stresses his career and damages
the emotional stability of his 3 children.
The Ethicist answers: you need to
decide if your psychological damage from gender dysphoria greater than the
psychological damage that its restoration will inflict upon the lives of any
(or all) of your children. If “yes”, proceed, if “no”, don’t. The original
article is well worth reading either in print or online.
In brief: Among
professionals, there has been some buzz about the number of people identifying
as transgender. A survey in Mass. of
25,000 households found an incidence of .5% (1 in 200) households in which a
person answered YES to 2 questions identifying a member as transgender. (BTW, respondents were found to be
healthier than the general population, possibly because they see physicians
more often.) Other studies of incidence
found .4% and .9% in contiguous states.
The UK Equality and Human Rights Commission did a survey that found 1%
of the population experienced some degree of gender variance.