The Cutting Edge-April 14, 2014
Barbara F.
Anderson, Ph.D., LCSW
“Neither Female Nor Male” is the title of an op-ed piece
by Julia Baird in the NY Times, April 7, 2014.
Ms Baird hails from Sydney, Australia and is commenting on a recent
Australian court decision addressing the desire for some individuals to decline
to adhere to the binary system of gender.
At the center is an individual, Norrie May-Welby “who has been permitted
to register as ‘nonspecific’ on official certificates. Now, 52, Norrie was identified as male when
she was born… but was drawn to the world of girls…. In 1989, Norrie underwent
gender [sic] reassignment surgery. But
after a while being purely female did not seem right, either.” The article goes on to say that she “began
questioning the sex binary, and realized I didn’t want to dissociate myself
from aspects of myself simply because they were labeled masculine…. I am both a
man and a woman, I am not simply one and not the other.”
Along the same lines, Facebook now offers users 50
different alternate opportunities to identify one’s gender. Some of the options are non-binary, neutrois,
androgyne, agender, gender fluid and neither.
This “gender project” was developed with input from Glaad in NY. Facebook has not revealed how many users have
departed from the standard choices of M & F.
The 2nd annual Trans 100 event has just
occurred. Its purpose is to recognize
trans persons who have had a positive impact on society. Trans model, Carmen Carrera, as well as Alana
Nicole Sholar, author of “Hung in the Middle: A Journey of Gender Discovery”
were both recognized. (See April’s
edition of this column for a review of Ms. Sholar’s book).
The NY Times of April 12, 2014 featured an op-ed article,
“The Trouble With Too Much T.” The authors, one a bio-ethicist, Katrina
Karkazis and Rebecca Jordan-Young, a professor of women’s gender studies,
highlight the unfairness of subjecting women athletes with higher-than-average
testosterone levels to humiliating tests and treatment involving either surgery
or drug therapy to reduce their hormone levels.
The authors cite studies which dispute the commonly held belief that T
levels predict performance outcome on tests of speed, strength, or
determination to win. Instead they
maintain that lean body mass better explains superior performance.
No comments:
Post a Comment